Unfair, unkind, untrue and ubiquitous
March 8, 2013
Unfair, Unkind, Untrue and Ubiquitous
The abuse of a person (or animal) generally takes place behind closed doors. This happens at home, at work, at school, etc. At core, the perpetrators are cowards, which is demonstrated by their choice of prey. They take on those who are smaller and weaker, and they inflict the torment where it can’t be heard, seen or stopped. And there are many forms of abuse that are not physical, but extremely destructive.
Abusive relationships are largely invisible to the uninitiated.
The uninitiated have not been touched by this “other cancer” which is the fastest growing social plague on the planet.
The uninitiated think they don’t know anyone to whom this is happening.
The uninitiated think it won’t happen to them.
The uninitiated think they are immune because they are accomplished, intelligent, sophisticated, etc.
Case in point? Bernard Madoff’s victims. Case closed.
There are reasons for all of this. For starters, most forms of abuse remain hidden for a long time. The perpetrator maintains a mask of sanity outside the bedroom or boardroom and the target denies it, tries to hide it or can’t talk about it. In the case of animals, they are simply disposed of before their condition points to the culprit. The acts themselves—whether mental, emotional, professional, sexual, spiritual, verbal or financial—take place behind closed doors.
Like many diseases, abuse can go on for some time before the symptoms are serious enough that they show up.
For example, can you tell by looking that:
- A woman was verbally savaged or smacked by her husband this morning?
- A teenaged girl was raped and sodomized by her stepfather last night?
- A young wife has no money and is being blocked in her efforts to get work?
- A teenaged boy is tormenting the family pets in the house next door?
- A widow in your church has just been conned and lost her life savings?
- A toddler has cigarette burns all over her back?
- A coworker is not allowed to leave her house without her husband’ permission?
- The couple across the street are starving a dog to death in their basement?
Identifying the perpetrators and targets of abuse is based on a preponderance of patterns. That is, a woman who appears tired or withdrawn once in a while is not necessarily a victim of abuse. Likewise, a man, who seems a little more on edge than normal is not necessarily a perpetrator of abuse.
The key to recognizing abuse rests on there being a number of indications of some duration and intensity. Abuse is a pattern of behavior that actually becomes a lifestyle. It leaves clues the trained eye can recognize. Often a child or animal in a violent household will show signs of abuse before an adult.
Look around you today. Really look. What do you see?
Once you get your arms around this, you will be empowered to better protect yourself and those you care about. And hopefully, you won’t look the other when you see someone at risk.
Anna Moss
Towards DISCERNMENT for a better world
Content copyright (c) Anna Moss unless otherwise indicated
FIRST REPRINT RIGHTS ALLOWED WITH ATTRIBUTION
ALL OTHER RIGHTS RESERVED
Image copyrights retained by their originators.
Images shared for educational purposes as allowed by
Fair Use, Section 107, US Copyright Act 1976
What I want for president’s day
February 18, 2013
Guest post by “DB”
What I Want For President’s Day
Instead of the same, old boring, meaningless, expensive rituals attached to what’s left of this once illustrious day in this once illustrious country, you know what I’d like to see the president do? (First of all, I’d like to see a REAL president–natural born citizen, a scholar, statesman, role model–dream on.)
But anyway, since things are getting so dire so fast, I’d like to see the president, his entire administration (past and present), the entire congress, the supremes, officers of the fed and lobbyists go get SCANNED for PSYCHOPATHY.
Psychopathy is an increasingly hot topic these days, but here‘s a decent working definition:
“psychopathy is a mental disorder marked by affective, interpersonal and behavioral abnormalities. In particular, people with psychopathy demonstrate an incapacity for empathy and guilt, impulsivity, egocentricity and chronic violations of social, moral and legal norms…”
- Those who are found to be psychopathic will be removed along with their ill-gotten gains and pensions, their records seized and reviewed with a fine-tooth comb.
- Those who are borderline psychopaths will be put into positions that offers them NO ACCESS to prey items (women, children, drugs, money, wmd, power, blackmail, etc.) or influence. Their records and staff will be vigorously investigated.
- Those who are not psychopathic will continue in their positions under the appropriate scrutiny.
There would be nothing to lose and everything to gain for those of us who love this country, its divine blessings and original principles.
This is the target
February 5, 2013
This is the Target
Biowarfare has been being waged against people all over the world for decades. This is who they are warring against:
Family farming is highly sustainable. Corporate farming is highly ruinous.
Lab rats exposed to Monsanto products (genetically engineered foods).
Anyone in farming can tell you how crucial it is to have bees. No bees, no crops.
Let evil get control of the food supply and they’ll do the same thing as their brothers who got control of the money supply.
That companies like Monsanto even exist is evidence of the very great sickness of the global infestation of spiritual evil in high places.
What you tolerate increases.
Anna Moss
Founder, Wiser Now
Author, RELATIONSHIP RED FLAGS
and THE RED FLAGS WORKBOOK
Towards DISCERNMENT for a better world
Content copyright (c) Anna Moss unless otherwise indicated
FIRST REPRINT RIGHTS ALLOWED WITH ATTRIBUTION
ALL OTHER RIGHTS RESERVED
Image copyrights retained by their originators.
Images shared for educational purposes as allowed by
Fair Use, Section 107, US Copyright Act 1976
We are being lied to
January 28, 2013
We Are Being Lied To
The oldest generation represents the last sheep who are going willingly to slaughter.
They do not have access to the internet, nor are they suspicious of what they have been told by their teachers, doctors, lawyers, accountants, pastors, neighbors and so forth. They:
- take their flu shots
- get their mouths filled with mercury amalgams
- eat processed foods, drink tap water
- think Oswald killed Kennedy
- watch the History channel and think it’s real history
- think newspaper and tv news is real news
- support the troops because they’re defending our freedom
- think it’s safe to have their life savings in a bank or the stock market
- cast their vote because it’s the thing to do
- think there’s a difference between democrat and republican
- give generously to aid efforts because they think the money gets to the victims
- bought the “terrorist” story about 911
- wept over the schools shot up by lone-nut gunmen
- vote because they think elections are real and honest
- think Congress is on their side
- think federal reserve notes are real money
- believe their taxes fund the government
- trust the president to lead the country to greater freedom and prosperity
They have not been shaken to the core by the discovery, accidental or intentional, that everything of substance they’ve been told is nothing more than a pathological patchwork of lies. All of it.
When you’re on the receiving end of this kind of lying in a marriage, you eventually face the fact that the entire marriage is a fraud; it only looks like a marriage from the outside. It works the same way in an organization. When a marriage, a company or a government has attained control through deceit, the whole thing is rendered null and void. This is what fraud means. The PR of the legal system is that due process and will eventually set things aright, but only after it has bellied up to the table to devour the first offerings.
When fraud is perpetrated in a marriage, the two people usually get divorced because one person is real, the other is fake, and the real one can’t ever believe, love or trust the fake one again. It works the same way in an organization. When someone goes to the trouble to mislead you in order to benefit from that deception, the trust evaporates like water on hot pavement. One minute, there’s a wet spot, the next minute, it’s gone and it’s all over except for maybe a little hissing.
Some of my relatives and friends are in their 70s and 80s now. They have no idea that they have been lied to their entire lives by every arm of government, every business ad, every political pitch, every pulpit message. When scandals break, they are quick to forgive and don’t take much note.
They have lived peaceful, productive lives. They have followed laws and rules, they have done their duty and then some. For this, they will be finished off in the next few years by the parasitical and predatory systems that have fastened themselves to our lives. The women have all allowed body parts to be cut off without question, even without second opinions. They all say how “nice” their doctors are, who make it their business to prescribe dope, stick needles in them and take scalpels to them, but say nothing about what FDA-processed foods are doing to them.
Where do you begin with these sweet lambs? It’s too late for them. I doubt any of them could wrap their heads around the situation we now face in this country. Like a lot of my generation, I grew up wearing rose-colored glasses. I assumed the education I was paying for at top universities in this country and others was based on reliable, factual truth. I assumed people in positions of power were there because they wanted to do good. I assumed the news was truthful and those who wrote critical commentary spoke of their own accord.
What shall we do?
Anna Moss
Founder, Wiser Now
Author, RELATIONSHIP RED FLAGS
and THE RED FLAGS WORKBOOK
Towards DISCERNMENT for a better world.
Content copyright (c) Anna Moss unless otherwise indicated
FIRST REPRINT RIGHTS ALLOWED WITH ATTRIBUTION
ALL OTHER RIGHTS RESERVED
Image copyrights retained by their originators.
Images shared for educational purposes as allowed by
Fair Use, Section 107, US Copyright Act 1976
Squatting: just desserts for the boinkers
January 25, 2013
Squatting: Just Desserts for the Boinkers
Banker + Oinker = Boinker
As planned (by bankers) and implemented (by lawyers) decades ago, there are now record numbers of homeless Americans and record numbers of foreclosed homes.
About half of them are women with children who’ve fled violent homes. About a quarter are transient, moving from shelter to shelter. The other quarter are completely unsheltered, that is, on the streets. Reports vary on how many of the homeless are children on their own, but there are tens of thousands of them. (This is a rabbit trail for another day.)
Here’s a bold and appropriate response:
This ingenious comeuppance is actually based on law:
Adverse possession is a principle of real estate law that gives anyone who possesses the land of another for an extended period of time in an ‘actual, open, hostile and continuous’ manner the right to claim legal title to that land. The exact elements of an adverse possession claim may be different in each state. In Florida, the law prescribes continuous possession of at least seven years. In New Jersey, a squatter must be in possession of the property for 30 years, while in New York it’s 10 years. In some states, the trespasser must have paid taxes on the property during this time period. Other states don’t require payment of property taxes, but will apply a shorter time requirement for occupying the land if the trespasser has paid taxes.
At some point, I’m sure the Boinkers will get their lawyers to try to put an end to it, but in the meantime, squatting offers some sweet revenge. I wish a million families would do it and succeed.
To echo Davos’ marvelous essay on the still unpunished MF Global theft and thuggery, I won’t be surprised if I wake up some fine morning and learn that bankers are staying in their homes (or as American Kabuki reports, fleeing the country) for fear of being barbecued (or held accountable). I would link to Davos’ article so you could feast on its revelations, but his blog and articles seem to be experiencing persistent technical difficulties. Hmmmmmmm. PsychopathicEconomics.com
I don’t eat swineflesh, but I’ll bring dessert!
The Boinkers have “fattened their hearts in a day of slaughter.” Now, those of us who hunger for righteousness are going to get “look on with our eyes and see the recompense of the wicked…”
Anna Moss
Founder, Wiser Now
Author, RELATIONSHIP RED FLAGS
and THE RED FLAGS WORKBOOK
Towards DISCERNMENT for a better world.
Content copyright (c) Anna Moss unless otherwise indicated
FIRST REPRINT RIGHTS ALLOWED WITH ATTRIBUTION
ALL OTHER RIGHTS RESERVED
Image copyrights retained by their originators.
Images shared for educational purposes as allowed by
Fair Use, Section 107, US Copyright Act 1976
Savile’s reign of sexual terror
January 11, 2013
Savile’s Reign of Sexual Terror
Not too long ago, I read that, on average, a pedophile molests about 130 children in his “career”– a sickening statistic, to be sure. That envelope is being pushed by what investigators are learning about Jimmy Savile. A little over a year after his death, the number of individuals who have come forward to offer both first- and second-hand accounts of sexual assault and intimidation by the former BBC star is approaching 500.
“A Metropolitan Police report giving the findings of Operation Yewtree, the investigation into Savile’s offending launched after an ITV documentary exposed his paedophilia last year, says that 450 people have now made complaints to the police, and to date 214 offences have been identified across 28 police force areas. They include 126 indecent acts and 34 rapes.”
Read more here.
Those of us who pay attention to patterns of opinion molding are alarmed to see pedophilia (as well as bestiality) being positioned to go mainstream. It will be interesting to see what the final outcome is of the growing case against Savile. It’s not hard to surmise that he used his position as a BBC brand to compel access and secrecy. How many young BBC employees he threatened may never be known.
The fact that he “volunteered” at hospital, and was even given his own quarters, is more evidence of what he was up to. Many who worked with him also related his attraction for corpses.
Although genitalia is used as a weapon, sexual crimes are not about sex, they are about gaining control and inflicting pain. They are a heinous form of interpersonal violence that deliver wounds to body, mind and spirit. Those against children should be capital crimes because what has been taken cannot be restored. It should also be remembered that coming forward to report sexual assault, even when the perpetrator is dead or locked up, is painful and not without risk.
In the broader context of abusive relationships, sexual contact provides not just a set of behaviors for the perpetrator’s deranged gratifications, but they create a conduit through which evil can and does enter the victim.
When victims of rape later commit suicide or descend into addiction, as they often do, it’s widely reported that they did so out of shame. My experience and research tells me that many are likely driven to it by the evil that entered and overcame them. Destruction is the ultimate goal of evil and it especially targets the innocent and those who strive to do good.
Predators go where their prey is. No exceptions. You always find them working with children and animals. No exceptions. This is why I support the death penalty for child abuse and animal abuse. I know firsthand that what you tolerate increases.
Anna Moss
Founder, Wiser Now
Author, RELATIONSHIP RED FLAGS
and THE RED FLAGS WORKBOOK
Towards DISCERNMENT for a better world.
Content copyright (c) Anna Moss unless otherwise indicated
FIRST REPRINT RIGHTS ALLOWED WITH ATTRIBUTION
ALL OTHER RIGHTS RESERVED
Image copyrights retained by their originators.
Images shared for educational purposes as allowed by
Fair Use, Section 107, US Copyright Act 1976
Irretrievably broken
January 7, 2013
Irretrievably Broken
Red Flags Rating: 5/5, Red for Pathological
It’s one thing to be able to recognize an aberration when it is new to you, but it’s something else entirely to be able to recognize it when you were raised with it.
The US economy is just one example of something so corrupt and fraudulent that continues to exist because people can’t see what it is and where it’s taking us.
It is insupportable and unsustainable. It is the product of some of the most diseased minds in human history.
The following article is reprinted in its entirety from The Economic Collapse Blog
If Barack Obama can “solve” the debt ceiling crisis by printing up some trillion dollar coins, then why does the federal government need our money?
As another debt ceiling showdown approaches, many in the liberal media are suggesting that if Congress does not raise the debt ceiling that Obama should just have the U.S. Treasury create a trillion dollar platinum coin and use it to pay our bills. It sounds crazy, but many notable voices (including Paul Krugman of the New York Times) are supporting this idea. But if the federal government has had the power to create trillion dollar coins out of thin air all this time, then why do we have to pay taxes? Not only that, why do we have a national debt?
If the federal government can just create money whenever it wants, then why does the federal government ever have to borrow it from others? The U.S. Constitution actually grants Congress the power to “coin money”, so why is the Federal Reserve doing it? Those are some very important questions. Most Americans don’t even realize that the U.S. government never actually needed to borrow a single penny from anyone else. The U.S. Congress has the authority to create debt-free money whenever it wants to. Conceivably, the entire federal government could be funded without ever borrowing a single dollar and without ever receiving a single dollar from any of us in taxes. Just imagine that – a nation without a single penny of national debt, no income tax and no IRS. What a wonderful world that would be. Of course there would be other potential dangers under such a system (such as runaway inflation), and those dangers would have to be addressed. But the truth is that we don’t have to have an income tax or 16 trillion dollars of government debt. We only have those things because we have chosen to have those things.
Sometimes, a crisis can illuminate options that most people had not considered previously. As another debt ceiling crisis draws closer, many are looking for ways for the U.S. government to be able to continue to pay its bills if Congress does not authorize an increase in the debt ceiling.
If a debt ceiling agreement is not worked out, the U.S. government will soon only be able to pay about half the bills that are coming due after interest payments on the national debt (which will almost certainly be prioritized) are made.
That is why a lot of people on the left are pushing the “trillion dollar coin” alternative. So how would this work exactly? The mechanics were recently explained by Jim Pethokoukis on his American Enterprise Institute blog…
There are limits on how much paper money the U.S. can circulate and rules that govern coinage on gold, silver, and copper. BUT, the Treasury has broad discretion on coins made from platinum. The theory goes that the U.S. Mint would create a handful of trillion dollar (or more) platinum coins. The President would then order the coins deposited at the Fed, who would then put the coin(s) in the Treasury who now can pay all their bills and a default is removed from the equation. The effects on the currency market and inflation are unclear, to say the least.
In my opinion, if anyone in the federal government is going to be creating money out of thin air, it should be the U.S. Congress. After all, according to Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, it is the U.S. Congress that has been granted the authority to “coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures”.
But those that are pushing Obama to create a “trillion dollar coin” point to a law that Congress passed that allows the U.S. Treasury to mint platinum coins. The following is from a recent CNN article…
Normally, the Federal Reserve is charged with issuing currency. But U.S. law, specifically 31 USC § 5112, also grants Treasury permission to “mint and issue platinum bullion coins and proof platinum coins.”
This section of law was meant to allow for the printing of commemorative coins and the like. But the Treasury Secretary has the authority to mint these coins in any denomination he or she sees fit.
But it wouldn’t quite be that easy. According to a recent ABC News article, some elements of the coin design would have to be determined by legislation…
The more difficult part comes sometime after the decision is made to coin the platinum and before the Mint gets to work in sculpting the pieces.
At that point, the American people must decide whose face will adorn the trillion dollar trinket. The process to determine the “specs” of the coin, U.S. Mint Public Affairs Specialist Genevieve Billia warns, must be “determined by legislation,” creating the potential for another congressional impasse.
So we would likely end up back at square one.
But if printing up a “trillion dollar coin” does not work out, Paul Krugman of the New York Times has come up with another option…
Don’t like the platinum coin option? Here’s a functionally equivalent alternative: have the Treasury sell pieces of paper labeled “moral obligation coupons”, which declare the intention of the government to redeem these coupons at face value in one year.
It should be clearly stated on the coupons that the government has no, repeat no, legal obligation to pay anything at all; you see, they’re not debt, and therefore don’t count against the debt limit. But that shouldn’t keep them from having substantial market value.
Of course there is a very, very low probability that any of these wild ideas will ever be tried, but this debate has raised some very interesting points.
The truth is that we do not have to have a system where more money is only created when more debt is created. We could have a system where the federal government directly creates debt-free money that is spent directly into circulation by the federal government.
In fact, this has happened before.
As I have written about previously, during the presidency of JFK a limited number of debt-free United States Notes were issued by the U.S. Treasury and spent by the U.S. government directly into circulation without any new debt being created. In fact, each bill said “United States Note” right at the top.
Unfortunately, after JFK’s presidency no more debt-free United States Notes were ever issued.
But even before JFK, there were times when debt-free United States Notes were being used. According to Wikipedia, United States Notes were first used during the Civil War….
They were originally issued directly into circulation by the U.S. Treasury to pay expenses incurred by the Union during the American Civil War. Over the next century, the legislation governing these notes was modified many times and numerous versions have been issued by the Treasury.
So why are we using debt-based Federal Reserve Notes today instead of debt-free United States Notes?
If the Federal Reserve did not exist and the U.S. government directly created money instead of borrowing it, it is conceivable that we could have a national debt of $0.00 today instead of $16,432,707,263,449.56.
Which option do you think our children and our grandchildren will wish that we had opted for?
In a system where the government directly created money, it is also conceivable that we could completely do away with the income tax and the IRS completely. The U.S. once prospered greatly without an income tax, and it could do so again.
And the truth is that our system of taxation is broken beyond repair. If you doubt this, just read this article.
So what would the downside be to such a system? Well, of course rampant inflation would be a huge danger. Allowing Congress to print up money whenever they wanted to would be playing with fire. That is why it would be imperative for there to be a hard cap on what the federal government could spend. For example, you could set the cap on spending by the federal government at 20 percent of GDP. That way we would hopefully never end up looking like the Weimar Republic.
And the current federal debt could be paid down a little at a time using newly created debt-free currency. This would have to be done slowly to keep inflation under control, but it could be done.
Of course if you wanted to continue to fund the federal government through taxation, there are other options that would still allow you to do away with the income tax. For example, one of the ways that our founders intended for the federal government to be funded was through tariffs, and we could definitely raise a lot of money that way. Plus, that would have the added benefit of making American companies much more competitive again and it would reduce the flow of American jobs out of the country.
So am I in favor of having Barack Obama create a trillion dollar coin to get around the debt ceiling crisis?
Most definitely not. If it does not violate the letter of the Constitution (which I believe it does), it sure does violate the spirit of it.
But if the U.S. Congress decided to shut down the Federal Reserve and the IRS and they decided to abolish the income tax, and instead they started directly issuing debt-free currency directly into circulation, that is something I would very much be in favor of.
Yes, that system would not be perfect either, but it would be far more preferable to what we have today.
The mindset that will save you
January 2, 2013
The Mindset That Will Save You
Red Flags Rating: White for Good [4 of 5]
Distraction is something the deranged need to keep from facing themselves. They are high-maintenance in that regard. Their distractions take many forms. Those of them who operate behind the scenes also use distraction to keep us from figuring things out too fast.
From my observation, I’m convinced that anything surrounded by a bunch of hype and hoopla serves their agenda. And all of it points away from critical thinking, connecting the dots and so forth.
What most people, even those who sense something is wrong, have not yet wrapped their heads around is the horrifying fact that there are things being done that they cannot believe anyone would do. Many of them will never wake up because they are apathetic or brainwashed (and probably don’t realize it).
Mark my words, when you read or witness an event of unimaginable corruption, cruelty and senselessness, you are looking at the handiwork of the brain-damaged psychopath. Note that this handiwork is not confined to their longtime servant bankers, lawyers, etc., but often involves the use of one or more patsies who go in and do the deed that furthers their bloody agenda.
The fact that things are getting worse and fast confirms one of the hallmarks of the nature of their evil: psychopathy is permanent, irreparable and progressive. It gets worse with age. The sad fact of the matter is that there are a bunch of nasty, old men and women pulling levers and strings to make the world dance to their sick song.
The following essay is part of the antidote. Hats off to Mr Smith for writing it.
All battles, all wars, all fistfights and bar brawls, all conflicts in every place and in every time (except those conflicts in which both sides answer to the same puppeteer) begin and end as battles of the mind. No struggle is determined on strength of arms alone. In fact, the technologically advanced adversary with all his fancy firepower is often more vulnerable than his low-tech counterparts. This fact is, of course, counterintuitive to our Western manner of thinking, which teaches us to believe that the man with the bigger gun (or the bigger predator drone) always wins. Sadly, we have had to suffer through multiple defeats and overdrawn occupations in Asia to learn otherwise. One of the great unspoken truths of our era is the reality that the modernization of warfare has changed little the manner in which wars are won. Since the beginning of history, intelligence, force of will, and guiding principles are the dominant factors in any campaign.
Read more here.
Do Not Fear Hypothetical Dangers
Do Not Be Distracted By Minor Inconveniences And Personal Problems
Do Not Be Seduced By Gifts
Never Trust The Media Machine – Always Verify Information
Do Not Concern Yourself With Ridicule
Accept The Risk Before Confronting The Enemy
Understand Your Own Weaknesses
Do Not Buy Into Petty Authority
Acknowledge The Power Of Symbolism And Myth
Never Forget Your Individualism
Mind Over Matter
Read, watch and learn while you can. It is late in the game.
Anna Moss
Founder, Wiser Now
Author, RELATIONSHIP RED FLAGS
and THE RED FLAGS WORKBOOK
Towards DISCERNMENT for a better world.
Content copyright (c) Anna Moss unless otherwise indicated
FIRST REPRINT RIGHTS ALLOWED WITH ATTRIBUTION
ALL OTHER RIGHTS RESERVED
Image copyrights retained by their originators.
Images shared for educational purposes as allowed by
Fair Use, Section 107, US Copyright Act 1976
Hey now, hey now
January 1, 2013
Hey Now, Hey Now
Red Flags Rating: White for Good
They won’t win.
There is freedom within, there is freedom without
Try to catch the deluge in a paper cup
There’s a battle ahead, many battles are lost
But you’ll never see the end of the road
While you’re traveling with me
Hey now, hey now, don’t dream it’s over
Hey now, hey now, when the world comes in
They come, they come to build a wall between us
We know they won’t win
Now I’m towing my car, there’s a hole in the roof
My possessions are causing me
suspicion but there’s no proof
In the paper today tales of war and of waste
But you turn right over to the T.V. page
Hey now, hey now, don’t dream it’s over
Hey now, hey now, when the world comes in
They come, they come to build a wall between us
We know they won’t win
Now I’m walking again, to the beat of a drum
And I’m counting the steps to the door of your heart
Only the shadows ahead, barely clearing the roof
Get to know the feeling of liberation and release
Hey now, hey now, don’t dream it’s over
Hey now, hey now, when the world comes in
They come, they come to build a wall between us
We know they won’t win
Don’t let them win
Hey now, hey now
Hey now, Hey now, hey now
Don’t let them win
Hey now, hey now
Don’t let them win
Hey now, hey now
They come, they come to build a wall between us
We know they won’t win
The secret of your beauty
And the mystery of your soul
I’ve been searching for
in everyone I meet
And the times I’ve been mistaken
It’s impossible to say
And the grass is growing
Underneath our feet
Don’t let them win
Hey now, hey now
Hey now
Hey now, hey now
Don’t let them win
Hey now, hey now
Don’t let them win
Hey now, hey now
Copyright (c) Neil Finn, Crowded House
Meme: Sandy Hook inconsistencies
December 23, 2012
Meme: Sandy Hook Inconsistencies
Of all the inconsistencies other investigators have pointed out, the three that bother me the most (so far) are:
- the presence of the same people (actors, government employees) at multiple shootings
- the near total media blackout of discussions about the persistent role of psychiatric drugs in mass murders
- the uniform disappearance of all reports/witness statements about second and third gunmen
The latter has been documented at Columbine, Tucson, Aurora and Newtown. It has happened too many times to be dismissed as coincidence.
In each instance, a “lone-nut gunman” shoots up the place, then shoots himself.
The more we learn about Adam Lanza, the more unlikely it appears that he was mentally or physically capable of storming a school, shooting 27 moving targets, putting the rifle in the trunk of his car, running back in the school and shooting himself in the head all in about three minutes.
I do not want to believe what the evidence suggests.
I remind you that human evil is capable of what normals would consider to be unfathomable evil–and that is how they get away with it. No one can believe it.
God help us wake up.
Anna Moss
