We are being lied to
January 28, 2013
We Are Being Lied To
The oldest generation represents the last sheep who are going willingly to slaughter.
They do not have access to the internet, nor are they suspicious of what they have been told by their teachers, doctors, lawyers, accountants, pastors, neighbors and so forth. They:
- take their flu shots
- get their mouths filled with mercury amalgams
- eat processed foods, drink tap water
- think Oswald killed Kennedy
- watch the History channel and think it’s real history
- think newspaper and tv news is real news
- support the troops because they’re defending our freedom
- think it’s safe to have their life savings in a bank or the stock market
- cast their vote because it’s the thing to do
- think there’s a difference between democrat and republican
- give generously to aid efforts because they think the money gets to the victims
- bought the “terrorist” story about 911
- wept over the schools shot up by lone-nut gunmen
- vote because they think elections are real and honest
- think Congress is on their side
- think federal reserve notes are real money
- believe their taxes fund the government
- trust the president to lead the country to greater freedom and prosperity
They have not been shaken to the core by the discovery, accidental or intentional, that everything of substance they’ve been told is nothing more than a pathological patchwork of lies. All of it.
When you’re on the receiving end of this kind of lying in a marriage, you eventually face the fact that the entire marriage is a fraud; it only looks like a marriage from the outside. It works the same way in an organization. When a marriage, a company or a government has attained control through deceit, the whole thing is rendered null and void. This is what fraud means. The PR of the legal system is that due process and will eventually set things aright, but only after it has bellied up to the table to devour the first offerings.
When fraud is perpetrated in a marriage, the two people usually get divorced because one person is real, the other is fake, and the real one can’t ever believe, love or trust the fake one again. It works the same way in an organization. When someone goes to the trouble to mislead you in order to benefit from that deception, the trust evaporates like water on hot pavement. One minute, there’s a wet spot, the next minute, it’s gone and it’s all over except for maybe a little hissing.
Some of my relatives and friends are in their 70s and 80s now. They have no idea that they have been lied to their entire lives by every arm of government, every business ad, every political pitch, every pulpit message. When scandals break, they are quick to forgive and don’t take much note.
They have lived peaceful, productive lives. They have followed laws and rules, they have done their duty and then some. For this, they will be finished off in the next few years by the parasitical and predatory systems that have fastened themselves to our lives. The women have all allowed body parts to be cut off without question, even without second opinions. They all say how “nice” their doctors are, who make it their business to prescribe dope, stick needles in them and take scalpels to them, but say nothing about what FDA-processed foods are doing to them.
Where do you begin with these sweet lambs? It’s too late for them. I doubt any of them could wrap their heads around the situation we now face in this country. Like a lot of my generation, I grew up wearing rose-colored glasses. I assumed the education I was paying for at top universities in this country and others was based on reliable, factual truth. I assumed people in positions of power were there because they wanted to do good. I assumed the news was truthful and those who wrote critical commentary spoke of their own accord.
What shall we do?
Anna Moss
Founder, Wiser Now
Author, RELATIONSHIP RED FLAGS
and THE RED FLAGS WORKBOOK
Towards DISCERNMENT for a better world.
Content copyright (c) Anna Moss unless otherwise indicated
FIRST REPRINT RIGHTS ALLOWED WITH ATTRIBUTION
ALL OTHER RIGHTS RESERVED
Image copyrights retained by their originators.
Images shared for educational purposes as allowed by
Fair Use, Section 107, US Copyright Act 1976
Controlled opposition—timeless tactic of evil
November 1, 2012
Controlled Opposition—Timeless Tactic of Evil
Whenever you engage with pathologicals, invariably you come up against their attempt to control the conversation, to keep you in the box, to manage the paradigm. This is because they can only manipulate you if you don’t have access to all the facts and all of yourself.
Controlling opposition is one way to derail dissent, whether it’s a wife resisting control, an employee being forced to work too much overtime or a citizenry being mislead with propaganda. They want to define the limits of your thinking. There are places they do not want you to go in your head.
This always plays out around elections. Instead of no-holds-barred discussions about issues, they bridle inquiry by sticking to the left-right paradigm. You often see a good copy/bad cop choreography by mainstream media to keep discussion from going to the root cause of the problem. One of many national tragedies playing out right now is the enormous theft of honest debate at the highest levels of business and politics. This is not an accident.
Three Ways They Do It
Three of the most effective means of controlling opposition in personal and public relationships are telling lies so big they’re never questioned, withholding a crucial piece of information so that a false conclusion is reached and weaving a lie into information accepted as truth.
Unfortunately, most of us discover the lies we’ve been told after the fact. However, when you apply yourself, you can learn to identify not just the particular lies in which you’ve trafficked, but the methodology used to implant the lies in your life. And once, you get hold of that, your world will change for the better. This is a private and quiet discernment. It doesn’t show, it doesn’t give you away. It is simply a powerful and valuable tool to employ as you choose.
“Once you are enlightened by the flame of knowledge, it doesn’t extinguish itself easily.” Theodore Butler, silver strategist
When you identify what a person, company, party or nation will not allow to be vetted, you are over the target. What is it really that “they” don’t want discussed? What part of your mind and spirit do they not want roused? What was it John said about the truth?
Got discernment?
Anna Moss
Join me
Towards DISCERNMENT for a better world.
Content copyright (c) Anna Moss unless otherwise indicated
FIRST REPRINT RIGHTS ALLOWED WITH ATTRIBUTION
ALL OTHER RIGHTS RESERVED
Image copyrights retained by their originators.
Images shared for educational purposes as allowed by
Fair Use, Section 107, US Copyright Act 1976
The “epic downfall” of Lance Armstrong
October 25, 2012
The Epic Downfall of Lance Armstrong
Supposedly, the committee and persons involved in the investigation of doping allegations against Lance Armstrong are convinced that he cheated his way to biking history. This has vast implications for him and his associates because it means, among other things, that he has committed fraud, which like murder, has no statute of limitations.
I haven’t seen the evidence (yet) although it is being widely reported as mountainous, damning, overwhelming and epic, so I can only go on what’s being reported. Every thinking person knows the media lies to suit its own purposes, so just because they say it, doesn’t make it so.
If however, Armstrong is guilty as they say, then his current behavior conforms to that of the pathological liar as he is still denying all charges, crying foul and proclaiming his innocence.
In RELATIONSHIP RED FLAGS, I decoded eight weaponized behaviors that are widely employed by perpetrators of relationship abuse. These behaviors are applicable to personal and public relationships. Weaponized behaviors, such as lying, are used to put you at strategic disadvantage, disable you, destabilize you and even destroy you.
It Takes Two To Tango
Lying requires a liar and a believer—it’s a cooperative act, albeit an unfair one because the most accomplished liars go unexposed the longest. In lying, the liar gets what he wants when someone believes the lie, takes the bait, buys it, etc., and thereby enters into tacit agreement.
Why does someone lie? Power and control, mostly. He lies, you believe it, he derives power and you get something, too. In Lance Armstrong’s case, the industry got a role model, kids got a hero, companies got a spokesman, the cancer racket got leverage and so forth. Lying is a big part of the give and take in human interactions. And it’s the fabric of abusive relationships everywhere.
“Listen to what he says, but believe what he does.”
How Liars Lie
- Liars distance themselves with language. They refer to something that “happened” as opposed to something they “did”, they may even describe their own behavior in the third person.
- Liars use unnecessary formality. They refer to someone they know as “that man” or “that woman” and/or by their last name instead of their first, such as “Miss Lewinsky” instead of “Monica”.
- Liars use shielding phrases. They deflect suspicion by dropping these kinds of qualifiers into their speech: “to tell you the truth…”, “in all sincerity…”, “let me be blunt…” and “honestly…”.
- Liars use excessive detail. They offset lying with detail, sometimes to the point of overkill. Instead of describing something concisely, they go into great and unimportant detail.
What Liars Do
- Liars often immobilize their upper body while telling a lie.
- Liars either avoid eye contact stare predatorily.
- Liars use a fake (cortical) smile which involves the mouth, but not the eyes.
- Liars shake their head or shrug while using affirmative words in a lie.
- Liars blink more often than normal while lying.
- Liars position their bodies and especially their feet towards an exit.
- Liars may place themselves behind an object during a conversation in which they are lying.
- Liars often drop their voice while lying and keep it lowered for some time.
- Liars display anger typically with a sneer, which communicates contempt.
- And when they think they’ve gotten away with it, they smile (duping).
If Lance Armstrong is not pathological, he will come clean (no pun intended).
Anna Moss
Join me
Towards DISCERNMENT for a better world.
Content copyright (c) Anna Moss unless otherwise indicated
FIRST REPRINT RIGHTS ALLOWED WITH ATTRIBUTION
ALL OTHER RIGHTS RESERVED
Image copyrights retained by their originators.
Images shared for educational purposes as allowed by
Fair Use, Section 107, US Copyright Act 1976
Red Flags Around the Mainstream Media
May 10, 2012
The mainstream media is a study in blanket control. In probably every country on earth, it has managed to promulgate instructions for how humans are to behave and think. This is why there is so little variance in what you hear. If this there is variance of real substance, it’s likely “controlled opposition” to relieve political pressure.
The media literally sets the dial for what you are to do, how you are to think, where you are to go, why you are to vote, when you are to work and so on. This is no small order and it didn’t happen all at once. Their strategies are incremental, like boiling a frog…
Going slllooowww, at first
How Media Does It To You
If you ever have the chance to immerse yourself in a magazine, movie or newspaper from 50 to 100 years ago, you will be astounded at the contrast of values between then and now. And in that astonishment, you may discern the wily ways of the modern-day pharisees, how they seek to manage us with information so they can retain and increase their power.
The Black Hole
It blacks out what it does not want you to know. The presidential campaign is a current example. By simply withholding coverage of one candidate’s campaign, the media has effectively communicated to consumers that he does not exist, that his campaign has no chance, that his message has no merit. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen. As long as the media doesn’t get caught and called out for doing this, there are no major consequences. It’s crucial to grasp the scope of this practice. This post is not a Ron Paul commercial, but the black out of his campaign has been all but total, and so, serves as an excellent example. Take a look at any or all of these vids, in whole or in part, then try to find its relevant news in the mainstream press.
The Dismissal
When challenged, directly or indirectly, the media will either refuse to allow discussion, disparage the messenger or ridicule the message. Two of their main tactics for avoiding issues are to scream “conspiracy theory” or to dismiss it as “internet rumor”. They can also assume righteous indignation that such a challenge would be made. This works well when the challenger is an individual or a small organization because the media can use its blanket of control to smother the message or its deep pockets to bury the messenger in legalities. Whatever the tactic, the purpose is to refuse open discussion with implicit or explicit threat.
The Weight Throw
Some media professionals will quash information that challenges their authority by reminding consumers of their position. This can be done with volume, mass or a display of credentials, witnesses, yes-men of jargon. This response further impresses the meta message that they hold the key to knowledge and anyone who begs to differ is simply mentally ill or pathetic or both. This is used because it is effective in keeping the issue from being discussed, or worse yet, investigated.
The Too Busy to Bother
Another tactic often employed is a variation on The Dismissal and The Weight Throw, and that is that they are simply too busy and too important to entertain a challenge, no matter how well made. Again, there is no debate of issues, just a blanket denial of validity and as much character impeachment to repel not only the challenge but any who might get wind of it and be interested.
Anna Moss
RELATIONSHIP RED FLAGS, A Guide for Women
THE RED FLAGS WORKBOOK, A Blueprint for Personal Restoration
Content copyright (c) Anna Moss unless otherwise indicated FIRST REPRINT RIGHTS ALLOWED WITH ATTRIBUTION ALL OTHER RIGHTS RESERVED Image copyrights retained by their originators. Images shared for educational purposes as allowed by Fair Use, Section 107, US Copyright Act 1976
